Augustus, Res Gestae Divi Augusti (General Background)

To have access to the original text and the translation, log in or create new account.

Typology (Honorific / Funerary / etc.): 
Eulogy / Panegyric / Elogium
Original Location/Place: 
Rome, Ancyra, Antioch in Pisidia, Apollonia, Sardis (see below).
14 CE
Latin, Greek
The Res Gestae divi Augusti – the “achievements of the divine Augustus” – was named by Theodor Mommsen as the “Queen of inscriptions” on account of its remarkable length, preservation and quantity of detail (Res Gestae, p. 247). It is certainly one of the most significant texts for our understanding of the early principate, and offers ‘invaluable insight into the political ideology of the Augustan era’ (Cooley, Res Gestae p. 2). Upon the death of the emperor Augustus, on 19th August 14 CE, four documents were entrusted to the Vestal Virgins, which were later read aloud at the next meeting of the Senate. Suetonius (Aug. 101.4) lists them as Augustus’s will, instructions for the funeral, a summary of the state of the empire (military and financial) and a ‘catalogue of achievements’ (res gestae), which was to be inscribed on bronze plaques and affixed to masonry or stone pillars which stood on either side of the southern entrance to the mausoleum in Rome (Scheid, Res Gestae p. ix; Coarelli Rome and environs p. 304). Although the bronze plaques from the mausoleum have long since disappeared, the text of the inscription is known from four versions of it, in both Latin and Greek, which were inscribed on monuments in the cities of Ancyra, Antioch (near Pisidia), Apollonia and Sardis, where they were “published” perhaps shortly after his death. The context of the inscription in each location shall be considered below, before a discussion of the original text’s date, and the significance of its content for our understanding of Augustan ‘propaganda’ and the ideology it carried across the Roman world.
The Res Gestae in Rome
Augustus had begun building his mausoleum on the Campus Martius (‘Field of Mars’; an area of public land used in the early Republic as an area for men to gather before military campaigns) even before his victory in the Battle of Actium in 31 BCE; Konrad Kraft has suggested that the decision to commence its construction in Rome was motivated in part by the negative public reaction to the will of Marc Antony, which Octavian had (illegally) released in 32 BCE, and which revealed that he wished to be buried in Alexandria, alongside Cleopatra (Kraft, “Der Sinn des Mausoleum of Augustus”, p. 189-206; Zanker, Power of Images p. 72). This revelation had proved very unpopular with the Roman people, with the idea of their respective tombs playing a large part in the propaganda put forwards against Antony by Octavian before the battle of Actium in 31 CE. As Paul Zanker has stated, the building of Augustus’s Mausoleum in Rome is best understood in ‘the context of the crisis atmosphere just before [Actium], and the elation of victory just after’ (Power of Images, p. 73). The enormous, tumulus style tomb dominated the Campus Martius area and was, as Alison Cooley has described, ‘a powerful dynastic monument’ (Res Gestae, p. 4); it demonstrated commitment and loyalty to the city of Rome, and communicated the sheer magnitude of Octavian’s victory on a physical scale.
The form of the Mausoleum was similar to that of the Etruscan tumuli (tombs made from mounds of earth) in places like Cerveteri and Tarquinia, but its name referred to – and therefore inherently emulated - the great Mausoleum of Halicarnassos, built for King Mausollus of Karia and named by Vitruvius as one of the seven wonders of the ancient world (De Arch. II, 8.10-11). However, R. Ross Holloway saw parallels with the tombs of Asia Minor, and Paul Zanker has questioned whether or not the Mausoleum was intended to call to mind the burial mounds of the Trojan princes and their implicit link with the Julian family in Rome, rather than evoking the negative connotations of the Etruscan Kings (Holloway, “The Tomb of Augustus”, p. 171-3; Zanker, Power of Images, p. 72-7). Both models are possible, yet the most reasonable suggestion comes from Amanda Claridge, who has proposed the tomb of Alexander the Great, which Octavian is known to have visited in 30 BCE, as the archetype for the mausoleum in Rome; although its precise shape is not known, it may have been ‘an architecturally elaborate version of a tumulus in the tradition of the Macedonian kings (Claridge, Rome, p. 183). Once completed in 28 BCE, Augustus’s Mausoleum was the largest tomb in the Roman world, comprising an enormous circular structure of concentric concrete walls that led to a central burial chamber, the walls of which contained rectangular niches for cinerary urns and funerary inscriptions. The exterior wall of the monument was faced with, now lost, white travertine limestone. The superstructure of the monument is also lost, but Strabo, who saw it in 7 BCE, describes it as a great mound on a tall, white (limestone) foundation, covered with trees and a bronze statue of Augustus at its summit (Strabo, Geography V.236. For the physical architecture of the Mausoleum, see Claridge, Rome p. 181-4 and Coarelli, Rome p. 302-4).
There was some precedent for this kind of inscription; following the death of Pompey an inscription documenting his achievements in Asia was placed at a shrine he dedicated to Minerva in the north-east of the Campus Martius. The inscription is now lost but its text, given by Pliny the Elder (Natural History 7.97), recorded the success of his campaigns in the east (Luke, Ushering in a New Republic, p. 177). A further influence may also have been the silver tablets deposited by Julius Caesar at the feet of Jupiter in his temple on the Capitoline, which gave a public list of the honours officially decreed to him by the Senate, and which culminated with Caesar’s close association with the gods (Cassius Dio, Roman History, XLIV.7.1; Luke, Ushering a New Republic p. 178-84). Augustus’s Res Gestae is probably based on both texts, and demonstrates some awareness of their contents and associated narratives, but it was also innovative in its own right. The choice of bronze tablets for the inscription, rather than marble or silver, was deliberate; bronze was the material of legal documents and official administrative statements, and carried with it a sense of authority and permanence. The achievements listed in the Res Gestae were therefore elevated to the status of law and sent a strong moral message that corresponded with Augustus’s ambitions to act as a model and principled leader for the Roman people (Cooley, Res gestae p. 3). Alison Cooley has also noted that the achievements of Augustus were not the only ones recorded at the Mausoleum; alongside the Res Gestae were also inscriptions that documented the deeds of other members of the family, such as the senatorial decree awarded to Germanicus following his death in 19 CE which was commemorated on bronze pillars next to those which similarly recorded the honours passed for Gaius and Lucius, who had also died early (Cooley, Res Gestae p. 5). These decrees no longer survive, but one awarded to Gaius in Pisa may provide a model; it refers to his services to the Roman state in foreign expansion that is certainly reminiscent, in terms of emphasis, of the language of conquest found in the Res Gestae (Cooley, Res Gestae p. 6). It is clear that the Res Gestae of Augustus were not to be read in isolation, but rather as part of a more systematic message that included the achievements and actions of Augustus’s family, and most importantly his potential heirs. The fact that they all found their burial place within the Mausoleum before him only served to emphasise the dynastic impression; the ashes of Marcellus, Octavia, Agrippa, Drusus (the Elder), Gaius and Lucius were all interred there before Augustus’s death in 14 CE, a fact which, combined with the honorific decrees and funerary inscriptions also presented around the exterior of the tomb and in conjunction with the Res Gestae, communicated the strength of the Julian line and the exemplary characteristics of its members. Rather than recording the ‘achievements of the divine Augustus,’ the Mausoleum hosted what Alison Cooley has called the ‘achievements of the Augustan family’ in an epigraphic display that both stated their dynastic intent and justified their extremely powerful position in Roman society (Cooley, Res Gestae, p. 6).
The Res Gestae in Ancyra
As no physical trace of the bronze tablets in Rome has survived, we are reliant on the existence of three versions of the Res Gestae in a provincial context for the reconstruction of its text. The version in Ancyra, the provincial capital of Galatia, is inscribed in Greek and Latin, the ‘queen’ of inscriptions described by Mommsen.
Ancyra (modern Ankara) was a new city, founded by Augustus in c. 25 BCE on the site of an older stronghold in the same strategic geographical position (see Strabo, Geography XII.5.2) following the creation of the province after the bequeath of the king of Galatia, Amyntas. Although not part of its original design, the Res Gestae was inscribed on the Temple of Rome and Augustus, the headquarters of the provincial cult, the construction of which had begun during Augustus’s own lifetime (Cooley, Res Gestae, p. 7-8). Krencker and Schede demonstrated that the inscription was a later addition, through the smoothing over of a large area of the masonry surface of the temple, after Augustus’s death and perhaps as late as 19 CE (Krencker and Schede, Der Tempel in Ankara, p. 51). The Latin inscription was placed on either side of the walls of the entrance porch, and the Greek on outside face of the southern wall of the main chamber of the temple, the lettering of both texts painted in red, providing an impressive colour scheme against the golden background of the masonry blocks (Cooley, Res Gestae p. 10-12). Further inscriptions within the pronaos, or porch, of the temple recorded the annually appointed priests of the temple during the Julio-Claudian period, along with the details of benefactions that they awarded to the city, including such Roman spectacles as gladiatorial games and the distribution of grain (although other offerings were particularly Greek and Celtic by nature, such as donations of oil for use in the gymnasium and the giving of public feasts, which were particular popular amongst the Celtic nobility. See Mitchell, Anatolia, p. 109-110). Alison Cooley has proposed that these inscriptions were deliberately placed to invite a comparison between the gifts granted by Augustus to the people of Rome with the benefits given to the city by the Ancyrian elite, who held the priesthoods in the temple (Cooley, Res Gestae, p. 12-13). This thereby linked the worship of Augustus and Rome with the culture of euergetism and the benefits of the new social system established by the Augustan regime.
The Res Gestae at Antioch (near Pisidia)
In 1914 and then again in 1924, approximately 270 fragments of white limestone were excavated from the site of the Roman colony of Antioch, near Pisidia (Scheid, Res Gestae, p. xii). The city had originally been founded by the Seleucids in the third century BCE but was later named a colony by Augustus, where he resettled veterans from the fifth and seventh legions in 25 BCE, when Galatia was established as a new province (see Mitchell and Waelkens, Pisidian Antioch, for a history of the colony). Although in a somewhat isolated geographical position, the veterans of the new colony attempted to maintain a close connection with Rome and the principate. Barbara Levick has shown that the names attested for the colonists in the Augustan period indicate Italian origins (Levick, Roman Colonies (p. 56-67); they formed the elite of the new city and were expected to consolidate the diverse population of veterans, native Anatolians, and those descended from the Seleucid settlement (Cooley, Res Gestae, p. 13). The connection with the capital city was maintained through imitation, using the names of Rome’s neighbourhoods and even some monuments as a way of identifying the districts of the new colony (Levick, Roman Colonies, p. 76-8). 
The c. 270 fragments of inscription, in Latin, were discovered in a wide area close to the steps of a three-arched gateway, which connected a colonnaded street with a large square leading to a temple that was most likely dedicated to Augustus; the fragmented state of the inscription has led to varying speculation regarding the original context of the inscription, but it appears to have been displayed on the inner walls of the monumental gateway, the imagery of which also commemorated themes of Roman conquest and Augustan Peace (Cooley, Res Gestae p. 14-15 and 47). Like the Temple of Augustus and Rome in Ancyra, the gateway was dedicated before the addition of the inscription, in 2/1 BCE, but its placement here only served to emphasise the imperial message of the complex (Mitchell and Waelkens, Titlep. 146-7). Unlike Ancyra and Apollonia, where Greek versions of the text were placed, the use of only Latin here again reinforced the theme of conquest and victory that was appropriate for its setting; the ‘triumphalist tone’ of the Latin inscription and the monumental complex within which it was placed entirely suited a new colony, inhabited by Roman (indeed, largely Italian veterans) in a brand new province of Augustus’s Roman world.    
The Res Gestae in Apollonia
The Res Gestae in Apollonia was inscribed only in Greek, on a large base built to support several statues of the imperial household of Augustus, dedicated between 14 and 19 CE (Scheid, Res Gestae, p. xiii). Little is known about the town itself; it appears to have been dedicated by Greek settlers in the third century BCE, and was added to the territory of Galatia by Amyntas, one of the client kings instituted by Rome following the defeat of Mithridates IV (see Strabo, Geography XII.3.1). Amyntas left Galatia to Rome in a bequest upon his death in 25 BCE, and Augustus settled some colonists there, but the majority of information for the town comes from epigraphic evidence that attests to the involvement of the local elite in emperor worship as a means of justifying their elevated societal positions (Cooley, Res Gestae p. 16-17).
The Greek version of the Res Gestae here was inscribed on a large statue base which probably held statues of Germanicus, Tiberius, Augustus, Julia Augusta (Livia) and Drusus, based on fragmentary inscribed names also discovered (Mitchell, Anatolia, p. 104). The text begins with a dedication to Apollonia and the imperial names, with the rest of the text of the Res Gestae given in seven columns beneath this monumental heading (Scheid, Res Gestae p. xiii). Alison Cooley has suggested that the base, statue and inscription were set up by members of the local elite in the spirit of competition with other local centres of emperor worship, such as Antioch (Cooley, Res Gestae p. 18). A road, the via Sebaste, built by Augustus, linked the two towns (see Edict of the governor of Galatia), yet a sense of disparity may have been felt in the fact that Antioch had been founded as a full, Roman colony, whereas only a number of veteran colonists were sent to Apollonia and added to the existing population (Mitchell, Anatolia p. 77). The inclusion of the Res Gestae on this monument dedicated to the imperial family could, therefore, be interpreted as a symbol of the rivalry that existed between the local elites of these towns, and their use of the imperial cult as a means of demonstrating both the strength of their loyalty and their enthusiasm for the imperial regime. One inscription from Apollonia records a certain Apollonios, who is described in an honorific decree issued by the council as a “friend of the emperor and friend of his fatherland,” as a priest of Dea Roma and as having contributf the ee statues ulia Augy trs of the Augusir ( V, 142d in(Cooley, Res Gestae, p. 6>), meawing ce may in fact have beenain chrage of the entirs monumen).
The presence of three versione’ of the Res GestaeDdivi Augusti in a singlw province haspreculbed inmsuch discussionwas towhty andhowf the textcsame there from Romp. Mmodernscehoaorship (Cooler and Scheid, uliexaompl)e arewmary of referding to the Greek and Lati editsions of the text in Anatolinwas ‘opriees, wding to thevKaritsions of content between the two languags). This interpreaption hasmrovedaeway from the traditioial viea put forward byrprvimouseditorns of the texy, whichbRelivend the Greek inscriptions to have been part of Augustus’s/publication ‘lians tor each those provincial communitieshin which Lati was ot, yet a usrful language of communication Bruent andMofore, Res Gestae p. 2). However,itn is now more widnly ccepsted that the presence of tse inscriptions in three places within the same provincehis mare likely to be the recult of tse initiative of i divdutal provincial governos).Pvete. T onomane hasprcrently identiried m fougth further fragmens of the Res Gestae in Greek, from Sardis, indicaying that ae lesut oneopys of the text abs made in the neighbouting province of Asia (see T onomany, An(Cpys of Augustusn >Res Gestaa’ tm Sardis”, p.2827-8). Although only a verysm all fragmens of chprters21-22,; it reveaas a lrighely ifeferete translatio of the Latiy, whichchepns to nswter the questioy of weather tre Greek versionshat Ancyra and Apollonis were based ontan officia,” translatio;m the similarity of the texes and the heading that itroduche the,y coul, be indicayveh of their having beenoprid" diechely from theexaomplm in Rome (seeRaimage, Natuue andPuropose, p. 16-351). Theaissmiption that their existencehis the recult of an instruction that same diechely Rome is mare proltematic (see(Cooley Res Gestae p. 1-22,; contia(Scheid, Res Gestae p. viri andEick, , p. -2).Pprvimouseditsions of the text have suggested thatmsuch of the detail of the Res Gestae that is concrined with the provincas only seexaomplts of imperial expansion and the sangular-focud on the city of Romr woul, ot, have beenairteeistingtoe provincial communities Bruent andMofore, Res Gestae, p. 4. Yeat Alison Cooles’sprcrenr woky has suggested that closrt attnction to the Greek versions of the text in fact demonstrates a very deliberatd aapatio of the woky to matsfey anlaudsence outside of Romr (Cooley, Res Gestae, p. 94. Msuch of t is detail shall beeleuciasted in the associated-commentaties nf the text of the Res GestaeRes Gestae wasre>creatde in Ancyra, Antioch and Apollonisias suenly indicayveh of the success and strength of the message of the Augustan regim;t the presence of tse inscriptions in Galatia>is prof,e perhap,d that the administratons in Rome had been succesrful in its pr motio of theviratue of the imperial famils, and itseEncofravement of similaraicts of iratmousbe havcofa’ amongst the local elite of the Roman provinca).
Res GestaeRes Gestae, p. vi8). AlthoughJohn>(ScheihbRelivest it is possibly to disdern mare verioial itroducptions in the texe thatmmay havecoame from the emperor hitselr,itn isun likely thatmsuch ofewhatwbe readtodway was verioianly authoed;t it was bliographican, rather than auo-bliographican, woky that wasreni neered undef Augustus’s leadership ned with his apprvral, and which wasre>eivted as nd official document of tnate, ot, as a woky of piteNatuue (Scheid, Res Gestae, p. vii-viii4). The texteunds with the statemend that the woky had beenwriateenain the lst, ytrs of Augustus’s ifer (thetimeainJunen 14 C; (see(Cooley, Res Gestae, p. 2). However, Cooley has dduched from Suetonius’s dnscription of ow, and wven the four documents were deposited with the Vestal Virgins, that the Res Gestae was most likelywriateen during the lst, ytrss of Augustus’s ifer andrepre sent a ‘verioia,d finls summng-upe statemen… ofewhatthe thougatthe had achievd,o presentedinl accarrance with hisvcision both of his own ooldwas pvincpus end of Rome’s place within the worla’ (Cooley, Res Gestae, p. 37).
The Res GestaeDdivi Augusti is cleanly a political documen;,itn is nte an acurpatk rdobjpectivercendrting of thecareerd of Augustus, and hwoul, ot, be creatdehas sch). Isc intent was inherently complef; it attempted to mkea sense of andrepre sent the sdimicf chnage ofcordar that the Roman worle had undeg one during thencofnse of his principate.Aas Alison Cooley hassaid (Res Gestae, p.34)d, the textdoeis nte imitaen a singlw moden, but bs composed(, accardind to its own ules,s thereby periettiny Augustus the fneerom with which oe deline and interpref his oold in politis,s history and societ). It relpected hbetemargence of a new kind of Roman stat,y characteriued by its own"visuae languag,l expressioes and oerms which although initiaued by hi,s were not officially propagtued by the emperor hitsel;r his new“ languag,” wasrenthusiaiticanly dompted and iasslminatedbly amultnitude of socialkgroap,d from senatons toslaives, across>Itary anE, as demonstrated by thevKarmous versions of the Res Gestae pv class="field-label">htemati keywcordy:  ulv class="field-items" liv class="field-item even" >
h2v class=block__:titl">How to qunotl tis uag>

>p" Augustu, Rees GestaeDdivi August (Generca, Bckground)Aautho(s)n of tis publicatio: Carolvne, Barioebra/>Ppubliskin date: Sun, 03/12/2017 - 12:51ebra/>URL:>Viositd: Fri, 11/24/2017 - 08:48a

h2v class=block__:titl">Se-arc>

form acptiof="aAugustu--res-gestae-divi-augustigenercalbackgroundd"methods=postd ids=se-arc-block-formn accept-charset="UTF-8s">
buttion typs=submit" ids=edit-submit" -nam="op" valul="Se-arcd class="orm-submit">Se-arc>
Se-arc /-labev
input" typs=-hidden -nam=""orm_idn valul="se-arc_block_formn /v
>>/ulp >

foothry class="oothryreghioereghio-"oothr"v > >> >>>img" typeof= foafImuag" src="" width="265"a eight="70"aalt=""v/>e
>scripp src="">scripp>(funcptio(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i["GoogleAnalyptcsObject"]=r;i[r]=i[r]||funcptio(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(argnumens)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElvemen(o),m=s.getElvemensByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g; srtBefore(a,m)})(window,dDocumen,"scripp","//,"ga");ga("create", "UA-91229170-1", {"cookieDomain":"auto"});ga("set", "anonymizeIp", true);ga("send", "uag vie");>scripp src="">scripp>jQuery.exntnd(Drupal.setnkins, {"basePath":"\/n,"pathPhrefix:"n,"ajaxPuagState":{" thoe":"zen_jnrn," thoe_token":"ipuc4eUehc5zbpplrjwtdaW3q9RloJ3Rc1256_J8L-4n,"jsn:{"osits\/all\/modules\/jquery_update\/re plac\/jquery\/1.9\/jquery.min.jsn:1,"misc\/jquery.onnl.jsn:1,"misc\/drupal.jsn:1,"osits\/all\/modules\/fmancbox\/fmancbox.jsn:1,"osits\/all\/librariws\/fmancbox\/eource\/jquery.fmancbox.pack.jsn:1,"osits\/all\/modules\/google_maalyptcs\/googlemaalyptcs.jsn:1,"0n:1,"osits\/all\/modules\/readmore_formatthr\/js\/readmore_formatthr.jsn:1,"osits\/all\/librariws\/readmore\/readmore.min.jsn:1,"osits\/all\/librariws\/superfish\/"fid.jsn:1,"osits\/all\/librariws\/superfish\/sftouchscreen.jsn:1,"osits\/all\/librariws\/superfish\/sfsmallscreen.jsn:1,"osits\/all\/librariws\/superfish\/suppossitio.jsn:1,"osits\/all\/librariws\/superfish\/superfish.jsn:1,"osits\/all\/librariws\/superfish\/supersubs.jsn:1,"osits\/all\/modules\/superfish\/superfish.jsn:1},"cssn:{"modules\/system\/system.base.cssn:1,"modules\/system\/system.menus.cssn:1,"modules\/system\/system.messuags.cssn:1,"modules\/system\/system. thoe.cssn:1,"modules\/book\/book.cssn:1,"modules\/ commen\/ commen.cssn:1,"osits\/all\/modules\/date\/date_api\/date.cssn:1,"osits\/all\/modules\/date\/date_popup\/ thoes\/datepincke.1.7.cssn:1,"modules\/"fiel\/ thoe\/"fiel.cssn:1,"modules\/ nod\/ nod.cssn:1,"modules\/se-arc\/se-arc.cssn:1,"modules\/ushr\/ushr.cssn:1,"modules\/"orum\/"orum.cssn:1,"osits\/all\/modules\/ vies\/ ss\/ vies.cssn:1,"osits\/all\/modules\/media\/modules\/media_wysiwyg\/ ss\/media_wysiwyg.base.cssn:1,"osits\/all\/modules\/ctools\/ ss\/ctools.cssn:1,"osits\/all\/librariws\/fmancbox\/eource\/jquery.fmancbox.cssn:1,"osits\/all\/modules\/spaels\/ ss\/spaels.cssn:1,"osits\/all\/modules\/sprin\/sprin_ui\/ ss\/sprin_ui. thoe.cssn:1,"osits\/all\/librariws\/superfish\/ ss\/superfish.cssn:1,"osits\/all\/librariws\/superfish\/ ss\/superfish-smallscreen.cssn:1,"osits\/all\/ thoes\/zen_jnr\/system.menus.cssn:1,"osits\/all\/ thoes\/zen_jnr\/system.messuags.cssn:1,"osits\/all\/ thoes\/zen_jnr\/system. thoe.cssn:1,"osits\/all\/ thoes\/zen_jnr\/system.base.cssn:1,"osits\/all\/ thoes\/zen_jnr\/ commen.cssn:1,"osits\/all\/ thoes\/zen_jnr\/ nod.cssn:1,"osits\/all\/ thoes\/zen_jnr\/ ss\/stylts.cssn:1}},"fmancboxn:{"callbacksn:{"onCaencl":"gfdgdfgdfgn,"beforeShow":"jnr_cgusom_fmancbox_:titl"},"helpers":{" titl":{" typ":"insidl"}}},"betthr_exmposd_filters":{" vies":{"block_logos_purtnhrs":{"dis plys":{"block":{"filters":[]}}}}},"googlemaalyptcs":{" rackOutboundd:1," rackMailtod:1," rackDownloadd:1," rackDownloadExntnstioss:"7z|aac|-ar|-aj|asf|asx|avi|bin|csv|dDo(x|m)?|dDt(x|m)?|exe|flv|gif|gz|gzip|hqx|jar|jpe?g|js|mp(2|3|4|e?g)|mov(ie)?|msi|msp|pdf|phps|png|ppt(x|m)?|pDt(x|m)?|pps(x|m)?|ppam|sld(x|m)?|thmx|qtm?|ra(m|r)?|se-|osi|tar|tgz|toraent|txt|wav|wma|wmv|wpd|xls(x|m|b)?|xlt(x|m)|xlam|xml|z|zip"},"superfish":{"1":{"idd:"1","sf":{"animaptiod:{"opacityd:"show","heightd:"show"},"speedd:"flat","autoArroes":false},"plugins":{" ouchscreenn:{"modp":"ushruagin_predefinedd},"smallscreenn:{"modp":"window_widthn,"breakporinUnitd:"pxn," titl":"Maln"menu"},"suppossitio":true,"supersubs":true}}},"readmoreFormatthr":[{"speedd:100,"collaposdHeightd:200,"heightMargin":16,"moreLvnk":"\u003C!--[if lt IE 9]v >scripp src="/osits/all/ thoes/zen/js/-tml5--repond.jsn">![tndif]--> a<-tml>